This year Norwich became one of the latest participants in the City Deals programme resting back some tax-raising and spending powers for local democracy from one of the most centralised governments in Europe. Effectively 100% of our taxes are controlled by central government (5% being a capped council tax) and in the redistribution 30% is spent by local authorities compared with 50% in the USA and 70% in Canada and Denmark. It is another welcome reversal of a 100 year old process of central government’s emasculation of local authority power that destroyed an entrepreneurial culture fundamental to the growth of the great cites and towns of the 19th century. As Michael Heseltine’s report, No Stone Unturned in Pursuit of Growth, states, “the local economic leadership that drove the UK to the forefront of the world economy has disappeared”. With little financial power local authorities have become administrators and service providers distributing crumbs from central government. It allows little space for entrepreneurial or business flair because there is insufficient incentive to employ such skills. So it’s not surprising we are rather jaundiced with local democracy, the quibbling over what services to cut or protect and Byzantine planning policies since real power is held centrally; and, as a consequence, England has one of the most unrepresentative European democracies with little of the commitment to local politics as seen in the French commune and mayoral system. This is reflected in the number of electors per elected representative; in France it is 116 to one, in Italy 397 to one and in the UK, a staggering 2,605 to one. No wonder we feel such a distance from our politicians. No Stone Unturned in Pursuit of Growth recognises that we need to return economic power to where it is needed at the local level; but this has to sit with elected local authorities rather than through the numerous centrally controlled bodies such as the defunct Regional Development Agencies or their latest incarnation, Local Enterprise Partnerships. It is only at the local level that the particular needs of the local economy can be understood and that local communities can be re-enfranchised and reconnected to their locally elected politicians. As Tony Travers, the guru of local governance says, “I think that local government would make, on balance, more efficient and effective decisions than the same things done at national level, because national government just can’t understand everywhere”. Numerous recent studies have suggested that the growth of UK cities is hampered by this lack of power and are underperforming way below the level of similar European cities, the exception that proves the rule being London, the one place that does have good local representation. Until we re-establish strong democratic power bases initiatives like the City Deals, though welcome, are a partial but ineffectual fix. We need something more radical to allow local economies to blossom and in doing so we will create places worthy of our forebears. Anthony Hudson
DESIGN MATTERS: City Deals:Will they Empower Our Towns and Cities?
Author / Hudson Architects
Similar Journals

Transforming Tradition: Six Remarkable Barn Conversions
September 4, 2023Barn conversions stand as a testament to architectural adaptability; turning traditional agricultural structures into functional spaces for a range of uses. Over the years, our team has embraced the challenge of preserving the character of these iconic rural buildings, while repurposing them for con
Continue reading
How Can We ‘Future-Proof’ New Homes?
March 31, 2021The Covid pandemic has seen unprecedented numbers of us working or learning at home, but very few new homes are designed with this in mind. Larger, 4-bed houses often feature a ground floor ‘bonus room’ that is often labelled ‘Study’, but such provision is not often considered in smaller u
Continue reading
Could you play a ‘Leading and Lasting Role’ in the provision of your next home?
February 11, 2021The UK housing market is dominated by a small number of large PLC housebuilders, whose ‘product’ is remarkably similar – neo-vernacular houses designed and built speculatively for ‘typical’ nuclear families. To maximise return for shareholders they are generally built to minimum technical
Continue reading